Before the workshop I treated every double bottom as a buy signal. James walked us through a FTSE 100 example where the pattern sat directly beneath a weekly supply zone. I had seen that chart a dozen times and never noticed the conflict. Now I mark weekly levels before dropping to the four-hour.
— David L., index swing trader, Birmingham
The written feedback on my five trades was thorough — perhaps overly so on my third example, where I had clearly rushed the entry before London open. That honesty stung, but it was accurate. I have slowed my morning routine since.
— Fiona K., FX day trader, Edinburgh
Evening Chart Lab keeps me accountable. Watching Sarah mark up a cable setup live reminds me how many factors I skip when trading alone. I do wish the sessions started thirty minutes earlier for us northern attendees working full-time jobs.
— Tom W., part-time trader, Leeds
Our trading club booked three places together. The group discount was helpful, though one member struggled with the Fibonacci module on day two — the pace picked up quickly after lunch. James offered a follow-up call which sorted it out.
— Marcus and colleagues, Cheltenham Traders Circle
I came for confluence techniques and left with a clearer sense of when not to trade. The waiting exercises felt odd at first — sitting in silence marking charts for twenty minutes — but that discipline has reduced my impulsive entries on slow days.
— Anita R., commodities hobbyist, Cardiff
The remote format worked well over video. Screen sharing my TradingView layout let James annotate directly. Only minor gripe: my internet dropped once during the breakout exercise and I missed ten minutes of the group discussion.
— Chris H., remote participant, Norwich

Extended story: rebuilding a swing strategy around confluence

Participant: Helen M., Bristol · Programme: Confluence Setup Workshop, March 2025

Helen had traded FTSE 350 equities on a swing basis for four years, typically holding positions three to ten days. Her journal showed a win rate near 48%, but average losses exceeded average wins because she entered on single-factor signals — usually a trendline touch or an RSI divergence in isolation.

During the workshop's second day, Helen marked up ten of her 2024 trades using the confluence checklist. Seven entries lacked a third confirming factor within her defined tolerance band. Two of her three profitable trades had four or more overlapping elements, including a prior swing level and the 50-day moving average.

Over the following quarter, Helen reported taking roughly 40% fewer trades while maintaining similar gross profit. She attributed the change to waiting for horizontal support, trend structure, and a momentum shift to converge — even when that meant missing the first leg of a move. She now attends Evening Chart Lab monthly and completed a follow-up chart review in June 2025.

Helen's experience is individual and should not be taken as typical. Trading involves risk of loss.

Share your chart-reading goals

Tell us what you trade and where your current process breaks down. We will suggest the most suitable programme.

Get in touch